Re: [Full-disclosure] <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial CiscoSecurity Presentation

From: Georgi Guninski (guninski_at_guninski.com)
Date: 07/30/05

  • Next message: Thierry Carrez: "[Full-disclosure] [ GLSA 200507-28 ] AMD64 x86 emulation base libraries: Buffer overflow" 
    Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:51:55 +0300
To: DAN MORRILL <dan_20407@msn.com>

    On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 03:19:47PM +0000, DAN MORRILL wrote:
    > >From what I understand (I am writing a major paper on Intellectual
    > >Property
    > Protection right now, the Joy of being a student) the creator of the data
    > has the direct right under Title 17 and the DMCA to determine how the data
    > will be used (hence expiring CDR's and DRM).
    >
    > If data is sent in error that does not limit or otherwise reduce the rights
    > of the data owner, and the data owner can request that the data be removed.
    > The data owner can also request assurances that the data has been removed
    > from all parties that they believe have copies of that data. Cisco in their
    > message has acted according to American law by requesting that all copies
    > of the data that is held in private hands be deleted as they are the acting
    > IP owners along with ISS. Cisco is acting as the agent of the IP owner
    > (much like RIAA and MPAA do for artists and movie makers).
    >
    > Their request is quite legal, and at least they were polite about it.
    >

    oh, the first puppy on this thread iirc.

    can you broadcast your message to outside usa jurisdiction, preferably via
    paid commercials? 

    -- 
where do you want bill gates to go today?
 
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
  • Next message: Thierry Carrez: "[Full-disclosure] [ GLSA 200507-28 ] AMD64 x86 emulation base libraries: Buffer overflow"

    Relevant Pages