Re: [Full-disclosure] <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation

From: Jason Coombs (jasonc_at_science.org)
Date: 07/30/05

  • Next message: J.A. Terranson: "Re: [Full-disclosure] <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation" 
    Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:59:28 -1000
To: "J.A. Terranson" <measl@mfn.org>

    J.A. Terranson wrote:
    > On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Jason Coombs wrote:
    >>reverse engineered.
    >
    > *millions* of copies of these "secrets" in general circulation. Nobody
    > can assert with a straight face that anything about Lynn's presentation is
    > not completely and totally within the public view - and irretrievably so.

    Just because you have a copy doesn't mean the document is in public
    view. The infowarrior.org URL no longer provides a copy of the trade
    secrets to those who seek them, so the effort to control distribution is
    working. Anyone who complies with the court order will delete their copy
    of the document and forget what they have read.

    You are making an argument that the legal system doesn't work just
    because you can disregard it at your own peril. That's nonsensical.

    Regards,

    Jason Coombs
    jasonc@science.org
    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
    Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

  • Next message: J.A. Terranson: "Re: [Full-disclosure] <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation"