Re: [Full-disclosure] <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation

From: Daniel (deeper_at_gmail.com)
Date: 07/30/05

  • Next message: J.A. Terranson: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation" 
    Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:24:33 +0100
To: Russell Smoak <rsmoak@cisco.com>

    This raises an interesting point, if intellectual property is sent in
    error, do any of the laws pertaining to said property apply 100% or is
    there a weird shift of how they are applied?

    On 7/29/05, Russell Smoak <rsmoak@cisco.com> wrote:
    > All,
    >
    > These recipients received an email from Austin Mckinley as Cisco Systems.
    >
    > This messasge was sent in complete error and includes intellectual
    > property of ISS and Cisco Systems. Please delete and do not distrbute
    > the information any further.
    >
    > If you have any quesitons, please contact the Cisco PSIRT team.
    >
    >
    > Thank you for your cooperation.
    >
    >
    >
    > --
    > Russell Smoak <rsmoak@cisco.com>
    > Sr. Manager, PSIRT
    > Customer Assurance Programs
    > c i s c o S y s t e m s
    > Phone: 615-791-0972
    > Cell: 615-545-6473
    > _______________________________________________
    > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
    > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
    >
    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
    Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

  • Next message: J.A. Terranson: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation"

    Relevant Pages