Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation
From: John Kinsella (jlk_at_thrashyour.com)
Date: 07/29/05
- Previous message: Steve Friedl: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation"
- In reply to: Madison, Marc: "RE: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation"
- Next in thread: Jason Coombs: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:42:49 -0700 To: "Madison, Marc" <mmadison@fnni.com>
Lynn's is not a vulnerability per-se, in my mind, but a way to take a
vulnerability and turn it into Something Useful.
John
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 03:02:38PM -0500, Madison, Marc wrote:
> Am I missing something here, because it seems that two vulnerabilities
> are being discussed, one is the IPv6 DOS
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20050729-ipv6.shtml. And
> the other is Lynn presentation on shellcode execution via the IOS?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-bounces@lists.grok.org.uk
> [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@lists.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Geo.
> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 2:57 PM
> To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
> Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation
>
> >>Read the advisory a bit closer. Here the relevant lines:
> "Products that are not running Cisco IOS are not affected.
> Products running any version of Cisco IOS that do not have IPv6
> configured interfaces are not vulnerable."
>
> Yes, IOS versions that have the fix, or that don't even run IPv6 are not
> *vulnerable*. But all IOS versions are *affected* by the *mechanism* he
> described. <<
>
> It's acutally a bit worse than that, IPv6 is enabled on all interfaces,
> you have to execute "no ipv6 enable" and "no ipv6 address" command on
> each interface to disable it.
>
> Second, the exploit is limited to local network segment, except it seems
> to me a worm that spreads from router to router could spread via the
> local network since a local network segment is usually defined as the
> wire between two routers.. Infection would spread from one router to
> it's peers, to those peers, etc. (please correct me if I'm wrong)
>
> Geo.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Previous message: Steve Friedl: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation"
- In reply to: Madison, Marc: "RE: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation"
- Next in thread: Jason Coombs: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|