Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation
From: Michael Holstein (michael.holstein_at_csuohio.edu)
Date: 07/29/05
- Previous message: Jason Coombs: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation"
- In reply to: Jason Coombs: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation"
- Next in thread: Steve Friedl: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:39:50 -0400 To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
> Cisco is responsible for this entire mess. Had they engineered a secure
> product around a CPU that was not general purpose, none of this would be
> happening now.
Okay .. so we write 'special purpose' shellcode then. Cisco could have
designed the CPU as a ASIC, at the expense of being able to
field-upgrade like they can with software -- or they could have used
something like a FPGA to emulate an ASIC, at the expense of cost.
Everything's a trade off.
~Mike.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Previous message: Jason Coombs: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation"
- In reply to: Jason Coombs: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation"
- Next in thread: Steve Friedl: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|