RE: [Full-disclosure] RE: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything
From: Eric Paynter (eric_at_arcticbears.com)
Date: 07/18/05
- Previous message: Amit Klein (AKsecurity): "[Full-disclosure] NTLM HTTP Authentication is insecure by design - a new writeup by Amit Klein"
- In reply to: aaron_kempf_at_hotmail.com: "RE: [Full-disclosure] RE: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything"
- Next in thread: Steven M. Christey: "Re: [Full-disclosure] RE: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 10:06:28 -0700 (PDT) To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
On Mon, July 18, 2005 8:55 am, aaron_kempf@hotmail.com said:
> I just don't mean for VULNS. I mean for BUGS.
> Like when you import stuff from Access.. You try to import a spreadsheet
> AND IT DOESN'T FRIGGIN WORK.
Of course, you have the option to use another product. MS may be the most
dominant player, but they aren't the only player. They would improve
quickly if people (including large corporations) started forcing them to
improve by choosing alternatives. Unfortunately, most people don't care
about the little bugs.
I think this is getting a little OT since it's no longer about security
problems.
-Eric
-- arctic bears - email and dns services http://www.arcticbears.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Previous message: Amit Klein (AKsecurity): "[Full-disclosure] NTLM HTTP Authentication is insecure by design - a new writeup by Amit Klein"
- In reply to: aaron_kempf_at_hotmail.com: "RE: [Full-disclosure] RE: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything"
- Next in thread: Steven M. Christey: "Re: [Full-disclosure] RE: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|