RE: [Full-disclosure] Some VNC doubts : access server behind TCP/IPproxy or gateways
From: Aditya Deshmukh (aditya.deshmukh_at_online.gateway.strangled.net)
Date: 07/06/05
- Previous message: Michael Stone: "[Full-disclosure] [SECURITY] [DSA 738-1] New razor packages fix potential DOS"
- In reply to: Joachim Schipper: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Some VNC doubts : access server behind TCP/IP proxy or gateways"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "'Joachim Schipper'" <j.schipper@math.uu.nl>, <full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk> Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 10:49:04 +0530
>
> VNC does support 'reverse shells'. Look in the manual for your
> particular version.
Yes I am looking and testing this out
> You would need to open one or more ports on your company's
> firewall, but
> that isn't too big a problem, is it? Just tunnel it over something
> reasonably safe, and tell the helpdesk not to use
> 'priviliged' machines
> for incoming calls...
The holes are not in the company's firewalls but in the firewalls of the
Road warriors' computers mainly winxp sp2, firewall enabled so that nothing
Outside can connect to that machine and I would rather keep it that way!
________________________________________________________________________
Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Previous message: Michael Stone: "[Full-disclosure] [SECURITY] [DSA 738-1] New razor packages fix potential DOS"
- In reply to: Joachim Schipper: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Some VNC doubts : access server behind TCP/IP proxy or gateways"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|