RE: [Full-disclosure] alert: the 111111 bug
From: Larry Seltzer (larry_at_larryseltzer.com)
Date: 07/04/05
- Previous message: ZATAZ Audits: "[Full-disclosure] log4sh insecure temporary file creation"
- In reply to: Paul Schmehl: "Re: [Full-disclosure] alert: the 111111 bug"
- Next in thread: Thomas Binder: "[Full-disclosure] Re: alert: the 111111 bug"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 08:41:58 -0400
>>> For this customer 11/11/11 in the date field means, don't process this
>>> record, which will obviously cause problems with legitimate
>>> transactions on that date.
>>>
>>> I suspect using a new field to flag a state, instead of "special"
>>> data, would have been more appropriate.
>>>
>Not to worry. The 11th of November, 2011 is a Saturday. No one will be
working that day. :-)
Actually, it will probably be a 3 day weekend for Veterans (Armistice) Day.
Even less reason to worry??????
LJS
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Previous message: ZATAZ Audits: "[Full-disclosure] log4sh insecure temporary file creation"
- In reply to: Paul Schmehl: "Re: [Full-disclosure] alert: the 111111 bug"
- Next in thread: Thomas Binder: "[Full-disclosure] Re: alert: the 111111 bug"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|