Re: [Full-disclosure] alert: the 111111 bug
From: Paul Schmehl (pauls_at_utdallas.edu)
Date: 07/04/05
- Previous message: lsi: "[Full-disclosure] alert: the 111111 bug"
- In reply to: lsi: "[Full-disclosure] alert: the 111111 bug"
- Next in thread: Larry Seltzer: "RE: [Full-disclosure] alert: the 111111 bug"
- Reply: Larry Seltzer: "RE: [Full-disclosure] alert: the 111111 bug"
- Reply: Thomas Binder: "[Full-disclosure] Re: alert: the 111111 bug"
- Reply: Ron DuFresne: "Re: [Full-disclosure] alert: the 111111 bug"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 22:18:02 -0500 To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
--On July 4, 2005 12:03:02 AM +0100 lsi <stuart@cyberdelix.net> wrote:
>
> For this customer 11/11/11 in the date field means, don't process
> this record, which will obviously cause problems with legitimate
> transactions on that date.
>
> I suspect using a new field to flag a state, instead of "special"
> data, would have been more appropriate.
>
Not to worry. The 11th of November, 2011 is a Saturday. No one will be
working that day. :-)
Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Previous message: lsi: "[Full-disclosure] alert: the 111111 bug"
- In reply to: lsi: "[Full-disclosure] alert: the 111111 bug"
- Next in thread: Larry Seltzer: "RE: [Full-disclosure] alert: the 111111 bug"
- Reply: Larry Seltzer: "RE: [Full-disclosure] alert: the 111111 bug"
- Reply: Thomas Binder: "[Full-disclosure] Re: alert: the 111111 bug"
- Reply: Ron DuFresne: "Re: [Full-disclosure] alert: the 111111 bug"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|