Re: [Full-disclosure] Jack Szeszycki
Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu
Date: 06/29/05
- Previous message: Jason Coombs: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Jack Szeszycki"
- In reply to: Jason Coombs: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Jack Szeszycki"
- Next in thread: `Zidane Tribal: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Jack Szeszycki"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: jasonc@science.org Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:41:09 -0400
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:00:29 -1000, Jason Coombs said:
> Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 04:00:40 +0930, Jack_Szeszycki@viscount.com.au said:
> >>I will respond to your email when I return.
> > If, of course, the e-mail is still there when Jack returns. ;)
>
> Does this form a binding contract?
At least his didn't include a "this is privileged info and you may not distribute
it further" clause that tries to form a binding contract. I wish it had, I'd love
to chase after them to invoice them for the costs of taking down our mailserver
to make sure the message is *really* gone. Oh, and we'd have to do up new backup
tapes. LTO-2s are *expensive*, and when you're doing several million messages a
day, you go through a lot of them. Especially fun on a Monday, when we may need
to clean up 3 day's worth of tapes... ;)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Jason Coombs: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Jack Szeszycki"
- In reply to: Jason Coombs: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Jack Szeszycki"
- Next in thread: `Zidane Tribal: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Jack Szeszycki"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]