Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Case ID 51560370 - Notice of Claimed Infringement

From: Thomas Sutpen (sutpen_at_gmail.com)
Date: 04/07/05

  • Next message: Kristian Hermansen: "[Full-disclosure] Cisco Linksys WET11 Password Resetting Vulnerability" 
    Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 20:48:19 -0700
To: Full-Disclosure <full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk>

    On Apr 5, 2005 5:01 AM, Ag. System Administrator <sysadmin@agent.co.il> wrote:
    > More nice will be if this .iso file is just 451,486k of /dev/random junk.
    > Any proves that this file __IS__ Sybase Powerbuilder 9 Enterprise.iso?
    > MD5? Something?

    The question that would begged to be asked is how they verified it.
    If they were to download copyrighted software from somebody sharing
    copyrighted software, does this not also constitute a crime? Is it
    not true that downloading illegally shared software is itself illegal?
     I'm not a lawyer, of course, but it's been my observation that the
    legal system doesn't often smile on those breaking the law to prove
    that others are breaking the law, unless it's in a Hollywood movie, no
    pun intended.

    Perhaps copyright makes some sort of concession for this. But it
    makes one wonder...
    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
    Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

  • Next message: Kristian Hermansen: "[Full-disclosure] Cisco Linksys WET11 Password Resetting Vulnerability"

    Relevant Pages