Re: [Full-disclosure] Reuters: Microsoft to give holes info to Uncle Sam first - responsible vendor notification may not be a good idea any more...

From: J.A. Terranson (measl_at_mfn.org)
Date: 03/13/05

  • Next message: Scott Edwards: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Reuters: Microsoft to give holes info to Uncle Sam first - responsible vendor notification may not be a good idea any more..." 
    Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 01:59:05 -0600 (CST)
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu

    On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:

    > If you have critical infrastructure out on a secretary's desk, you're doing
    > something *very* wrong....

    The problem here is that "government" is not a bunch of smaller units that
    can be selectively given pre-material. "Government" is a huge morass of
    systems, many of which are critical, and many more of which talk to
    something critical by dint of being owned by this entity "government".
    Because any "government" issue is likely to cascade, all government is, by
    definition, critical. 

    -- 
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
sysadmin@mfn.org
0xBD4A95BF
"Quadriplegics think before they write stupid pointless
***...because they have to type everything with their noses."
	http://www.tshirthell.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/
  • Next message: Scott Edwards: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Reuters: Microsoft to give holes info to Uncle Sam first - responsible vendor notification may not be a good idea any more..."