Re: [Full-Disclosure] Multiple AV Vendors ignoringtar.gz archives (fwd)

From: Paul Laudanski (zx_at_castlecops.com)
Date: 02/08/05

  • Next message: hio hou: "[Full-Disclosure] XSS VULNERABILITY AT MODULE PostWrap"
    Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:16:28 -0500 (EST)
    To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
    
    

    Folks, here is a summary of a discussion with Mark at Eset for NOD32 about
    .tar.bz2. So what do you folks think, how many people would like to see
    this capability?

    -- 
    Regards,
    Paul Laudanski - Computer Cops, LLC.
    CastleCops(SM) - http://castlecops.com
    http://cuddlesnkisses.com | http://justalittlepoke.com | http://zhen-xjell.com
    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 09:30:17 +0100
    From: "NOD32 Technical Support (Mark)" <EMAIL REMOVED>
    To: 'Paul Laudanski' <zx@castlecops.com>
    Subject: RE: [support] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Multiple AV Vendors
        ignoringtar.gz archives
    Hi Paul,
    certainly, this won't be our priority any time soon. Our programmers are now
    being fully engaged with preparing version 2.13.0 and then they'll probably
    start working on NOD32 3.0. Can you estimate how many people you know of
    would be interested in having tar.bz2 archives scanned?
    Best regards,
    Mark 
    Eset
    Technical Support
    Slovakia
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Paul Laudanski [mailto:zx@castlecops.com] 
    Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 7:31 PM
    To: NOD32 Technical Support (Mark)
    Subject: RE: [support] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Multiple AV Vendors
    ignoringtar.gz archives
    Hi Mark, may I forward your reply to me below to the full disclosure list?  
    I'd like to request that this archive be included.
    On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, NOD32 Technical Support (Mark) wrote:
    > Hi Paul,
    > 
    > the tar.bz2 archives are not supported now at all, but could be in the 
    > future if more customers request to support them.
    > 
    > 
    > Best regards,
    > 
    > Mark
    > 
    > 
    > Eset
    > Technical Support
    > Slovakia
    > 
    > Web: www.eset.com
    > 
    > -----Original Message-----
    > Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 8:23 PM
    > To: Barrie Dempster
    > Cc: Full-disclosure; support@nod32.com
    > Subject: [support] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Multiple AV Vendors ignoring 
    > tar.gz archives
    > 
    > Thanks for replying back so quickly with further details.  I tested a
    > standard .tar.bz2 file and found that nod32lms didn't report on diving
    > into it.  I'll try to make time later to test it with a .tar.bz2 file
    > which contains Eicar.  However, I've also included NOD32 support in this
    reply.
    > 
    > But this is just one company, you do have a point.
    > 
    > On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Barrie Dempster wrote:
    > 
    > > I didn't configure the AV's I didn't fancy installing all of them 
    > > and thought virus total would give a good indication. It appears 
    > > from the virustotal results and from 
    > > http://www.nod32.com/products/nt.htm that
    > > nod32 will scan and detect tar.gz's but not bz2's. This is the most 
    > > common result and could be argued to be valid by the vendors.
    > > 
    > > However you can open tar.bz2's on windows so it's still a valid 
    > > infection vector, although probably not all that useful for viruses. 
    > > I don't believe many users will go googling for the tools needed.
    > > Nonetheless at least a few of the vendors think it's necessary to go 
    > > beyond the common zip and rar.
    > 
    > 
    > ________ Information from Computer Cops, L.L.C. ________ This message 
    > was checked by NOD32 Antivirus System for Linux Mail Server.
    > 
    >   part000.txt - is OK
    > http://castlecops.com
    > 
    --
    Regards,
    Paul Laudanski - Computer Cops, LLC.
    CastleCops(SM) - http://castlecops.com
    http://cuddlesnkisses.com | http://justalittlepoke.com | http://zhen-xjell.com
    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
    

  • Next message: hio hou: "[Full-Disclosure] XSS VULNERABILITY AT MODULE PostWrap"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [SLE] HP Laser 1020 (more)
      ... (Have I contacted the vendors?) ... I haven't contacted HP, which I just tried to do, since their support ... Check the headers for your unsubscription address ... Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com ...
      (SuSE)
    • irritably crush this post-war attack
      ... If the broken creatures can support almost, ... habitat may need more archives. ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • Re: Aint it Pitiful Rogers and Kali cite a PUNK!!??
      ... You claimed to have the support of major researchers. ... You claimed to have a doctorate in psychology. ... that you were doing the posting to spp under the name of B.R.A.D. ... Archives show you have been foul-mouthed and sexist with ...
      (sci.psychology.psychotherapy)
    • dump/tar/star/etc (was Re: Interesting speed benchmarks)
      ... For sparse file support: ... gnutar and star use some guesswork to archive them into "gnutar format" archives; neither can guarantee that the final block layout matches the original ... gnutar, star, and bsdtar can all restore sparse files from "gnutar format" archives ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • RE: FBA rant
      ... attach the 3310/3370's directly to the processor without having to have ... we usually got excellent support for all geometries. ... send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxx with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO ... Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ...
      (bit.listserv.ibm-main)

  • Quantcast