Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: [USN-74-1] Postfix vulnerability
From: FRLinux (frlinux_at_gmail.com)
Date: 02/06/05
- Previous message: James Eaton-Lee: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Multiple AV Vendors ignoring tar.gz archives"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: [USN-74-1] Postfix vulnerability"
- Next in thread: Martin Pitt: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: [USN-74-1] Postfix vulnerability"
- Reply: Martin Pitt: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: [USN-74-1] Postfix vulnerability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 02:08:19 +0000 To: Wietse Venema <wietse@porcupine.org>
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:09:57 -0500 (EST), Wietse Venema
<wietse@porcupine.org> wrote:
> FYI,
>
> This is a bug in a third-party IPv6 patch that is not part of Postfix.
>
> Neither the official Postfix release, nor the work-in-progress
> version are not affected by this.
Hello,
Does this affect the Debian version (which is v6 enabled) ?
Steph
-- "Step by step, penguins are taking my sanity apart ..." _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: James Eaton-Lee: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Multiple AV Vendors ignoring tar.gz archives"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: [USN-74-1] Postfix vulnerability"
- Next in thread: Martin Pitt: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: [USN-74-1] Postfix vulnerability"
- Reply: Martin Pitt: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: [USN-74-1] Postfix vulnerability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|