Re: [Full-Disclosure] ICMP Covert channels question
From: Andrew Farmer (andfarm_at_teknovis.com)
Date: 01/29/05
- Previous message: raize: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: NAT router inbound network traffic subversion"
- In reply to: cyberpixl: "[Full-Disclosure] ICMP Covert channels question"
- Next in thread: Gadi Evron: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] ICMP Covert channels question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: cyberpixl <cyberpixl@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:12:21 -0800
On 28 Jan 2005, at 14:45, cyberpixl wrote:
<snip>
> Assume there is a local machine (our target) with ip 192.168.0.2 that
> is connected to the internet using a router 192.168.0.1/88.88.88.88
> (that is not blocking icmp packets) and my machine is say,
> 33.33.33.33. If i then send an icmp packet to the 88.88.88.88 router
> with source ip set to 192.168.0.2, would it forward that packet to the
> host in its local network, or will it discard it?
Depends entirely on the router's configuration. Most will forward it;
however, some will, whether out of misimplementation or paranoia,
drop it.
> Is there any way to deliver my packet to that local machine?
There are some other nifty tricks you ought to check out. For example,
take a look at LimeWire's 'UDPConnect' protocol.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part
- Previous message: raize: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: NAT router inbound network traffic subversion"
- In reply to: cyberpixl: "[Full-Disclosure] ICMP Covert channels question"
- Next in thread: Gadi Evron: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] ICMP Covert channels question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|