Re: [Full-Disclosure] Packet/Signature-based Firewall
From: John (naverxp_at_yahoo.com.sg)
Date: 01/22/05
- Previous message: Ed Reed: "[Full-Disclosure] NOVL-2005-10096251 GroupWise WebAccess error handling modules (report)"
- In reply to: Greg Leclercq: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Packet/Signature-based Firewall"
- Next in thread: Greg Leclercq: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Packet/Signature-based Firewall"
- Reply: Greg Leclercq: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Packet/Signature-based Firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:36:51 +0800 To: Greg Leclercq <ggl@free.fr>
The l7-filter isn't working.
What is pom?
>>I was wondering are there any Budget/OpenSource signature-based firewall
>>around like the one Packeteer has? (packetshaper)
>>
>>
>
>If you want to make a linux-based solution, you can use Linux netfilter
>+ l7-filter: http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/. Check also p-o-m on
>http://www.netfilter.org for additionnal features.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Ed Reed: "[Full-Disclosure] NOVL-2005-10096251 GroupWise WebAccess error handling modules (report)"
- In reply to: Greg Leclercq: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Packet/Signature-based Firewall"
- Next in thread: Greg Leclercq: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Packet/Signature-based Firewall"
- Reply: Greg Leclercq: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Packet/Signature-based Firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]