Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: New Santy-Worm attacks *all* PHP-skripts
From: Steve Wray (steve_at_myself.gen.nz)
Date: 12/26/04
- Previous message: Andrew Farmer: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] new phpBB worm affects 2.0.11"
- Maybe in reply to: Paul Laudanski: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: New Santy-Worm attacks *all* PHP-skripts"
- Next in thread: Paul Laudanski: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: New Santy-Worm attacks *all* PHP-skripts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 09:32:00 +1300
Paul Laudanski wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Dec 2004, Raistlin wrote:
>
>>Juergen Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>>the new santy version not only attacks phpBB.
>>
>>How would these two worms react to classical hardening tips such as PHP
>>Safe mode and noexec /tmp ?
>
> For this particular strain it would certainly help, but that is why there
> exists new variations. Certainly doing it to /tmp, /usr/tmp, /var/tmp
> could help, but it isn't 100% foolproof, and some don't even consider it
> security.
It only protects you from exploits that cannot just go;
source /tmp/rootkit.sh
or other, equivalent methods.
ie its only effective against directly executing files on those
filesystems; you can still use other methods to run them.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Andrew Farmer: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] new phpBB worm affects 2.0.11"
- Maybe in reply to: Paul Laudanski: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: New Santy-Worm attacks *all* PHP-skripts"
- Next in thread: Paul Laudanski: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: New Santy-Worm attacks *all* PHP-skripts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]