Re: [Full-Disclosure] TCP Port 42 port scans? What the heck over...
Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu
Date: 12/15/04
- Previous message: SSR Team: "[Full-Disclosure] STG Security Advisory: [SSA-20041214-14] GNUBoard PHP injection vulnerability"
- In reply to: Matt Ostiguy: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] TCP Port 42 port scans? What the heck over..."
- Next in thread: Matt Ostiguy: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] TCP Port 42 port scans? What the heck over..."
- Reply: Matt Ostiguy: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] TCP Port 42 port scans? What the heck over..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Matt Ostiguy <ostiguy@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:58:18 -0500
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:33:42 EST, Matt Ostiguy said:
> found an exploitable bug in the WINS service. Still, given how few
> people one would expect to have that port accessible through a
> firewall, or just how low the percentage of windows servers running
> WINS is
Do you have any actual data showing that either of those two numbers is low,
or are you relying on "if people have clue, these will be low"?
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: SSR Team: "[Full-Disclosure] STG Security Advisory: [SSA-20041214-14] GNUBoard PHP injection vulnerability"
- In reply to: Matt Ostiguy: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] TCP Port 42 port scans? What the heck over..."
- Next in thread: Matt Ostiguy: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] TCP Port 42 port scans? What the heck over..."
- Reply: Matt Ostiguy: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] TCP Port 42 port scans? What the heck over..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
