Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?
From: n3td3v (xploitable_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/26/04
- Previous message: Todd Towles: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida"
- In reply to: vord: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Next in thread: n3td3v: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 05:46:38 +0000
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 18:34:03 -0600, vord <vordhosbn@gmail.com> wrote:
> i didn't get responses from anyone i knew ... i got responses from
> people who knew you, get it?
>
> btw, our offer still stands. if you would like to try and substantiate
> your claims, feel free to come back and try your hardest.
>
> this is over and never should have begun.
> DO NOT REPLY. I WILL NOT RESPOND.
>
> --vord
Ok, I won't reply to call you and this e-mail childish.
Too bad, my finger slipped.
Thanks,
n3td3v
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Todd Towles: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida"
- In reply to: vord: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Next in thread: n3td3v: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|