Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Sun Java Plugin arbitrary package access vulnerability
From: Exchange (pauls_at_utdallas.edu)
Date: 11/25/04
- Previous message: Martin Pitt: "[Full-Disclosure] [USN-32-1] mysql vulnerabilities"
- In reply to: Alla Bezroutchko: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: Sun Java Plugin arbitrary package access vulnerability"
- Next in thread: Exchange: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Sun Java Plugin arbitrary package access vulnerability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Alla Bezroutchko" <alla@scanit.be>, <bugtraq@securityfocus.com>, <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com> Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 12:23:20 -0600
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alla Bezroutchko" <alla@scanit.be>
To: <bugtraq@securityfocus.com>; <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 4:33 AM
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Sun Java Plugin arbitrary package access
vulnerability
>
> As noted by rodmoses(at)yahoo(dot)com Opera remains vulnerable even
> after the upgrade of JVM to version 1.4.2_06. (tested on Windows XP SP2,
> Opera 7.54, J2SE 1.4.2_06).
>
This wasn't mentioned in the original disclosure announcement, but is it
safe to assume that jre-1.5.0 would *not* be vulnerable? Or has it not been
tested?
Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/
AVIEN Founding Member
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Martin Pitt: "[Full-Disclosure] [USN-32-1] mysql vulnerabilities"
- In reply to: Alla Bezroutchko: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: Sun Java Plugin arbitrary package access vulnerability"
- Next in thread: Exchange: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Sun Java Plugin arbitrary package access vulnerability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|