Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?
From: Danny (nocmonkey_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/23/04
- Previous message: Phillip R. Paradis: "RE: [in] Re: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as FireFox"
- In reply to: nicolas vigier: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Next in thread: nicolas vigier: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: nicolas vigier: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: nicolas vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:38:10 -0500
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:21:45 +0100, nicolas vigier
<boklm@mars-attacks.org> wrote:
> Are you really serious ? Is it a joke ?
Dude, I am seriously a naive idiot who just wanted to rant about the
people that abuse IRC. Hopefully this was just a momentary brain fart,
otherwise I might be in trouble, eh?
Often there is humour in such circumstances; I had a few laughs in the process.
Shit! Maybe I will meet my future wife on IRC! I would invite everyone from F-D.
> This remind me some stupid article I read on nytime :
> http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/06/technology/circuits/06chat.html
> (account required, if you don't have one try ptramo/ptramo)
What a stupid article. The author has it all wrong! IRC is a bed of
roses with Celine Dion playing in the background.
...D
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Phillip R. Paradis: "RE: [in] Re: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as FireFox"
- In reply to: nicolas vigier: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Next in thread: nicolas vigier: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: nicolas vigier: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]