Re: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as FireFox
From: Antonio Vargas (windenntw_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/20/04
- Previous message: stephane nasdrovisky: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- In reply to: Stuart Fox (DSL AK): "RE: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as FireFox"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Stuart Fox (DSL AK)" <StuartF@datacom.co.nz> Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:46:54 +0100
On 15/11/2004, at 22:50, Stuart Fox ((DSL AK)) wrote:
>
> > Can the Firefox settings be controlled centrally?
> >Yes, and more flexible than IE versions zoo at user computers.
> Download
> >a Firefox ZIP (not Firefox_Setup_1.0.exe but Firefox 1.0.zip), unpack
> it
> >to R/O share on file server, edit JS configuration files in
> >.\defaults\pref and .\greprefs, then create a shortcut to firefox.exe
> on
> > user desktops. To change FF settings, edit JS configs again. Voila!
>
> Can the executable reside on the workstation with the settings stored
> on the network? In an ideal world, you'd be able to control the
> settings via Group Policy (which is how you do it with IE). I'm not
> sure your method is any more flexible than using Group Policy to be
> honest.
>
Thats exactly what you DON'T want. If you store the .exe on the client,
then they can overwrite it with a virus and gain control more easily.
Sharing read-only from a file server is the real solution.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: stephane nasdrovisky: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- In reply to: Stuart Fox (DSL AK): "RE: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as FireFox"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|