[Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?
From: Danny (nocmonkey_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/19/04
- Previous message: devis: "Re: [in] Re: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as FireFox"
- Next in thread: Jeff Donahue: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Jeff Donahue: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: huhu: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Mister Coffee: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: shrek: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: james edwards: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Maybe reply: Bowes, Ronald (EST): "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Jason: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Maybe reply: Tim: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Michael Rutledge: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: dk: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Maybe reply: Danny: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Robert Wesley McGrew: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Gregory Gilliss: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Eric Paynter: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Micheal Espinola Jr: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Tim: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Darren Wolfe: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: J.A. Terranson: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Maybe reply: Bowes, Ronald (EST): "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Andrew Smith: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Christian Fromme: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Chris Umphress: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Barrie Dempster: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Maybe reply: Keith Pachulski: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Maybe reply: Keith Pachulski: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Maybe reply: Keith Pachulski: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: bkfsec: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Maybe reply: Richard Stevens: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Matthew Kent: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: TheGesus: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Janusz A. Urbanowicz: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Nick FitzGerald: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: hutuworm: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: nicolas vigier: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Mailing List - Full-Disclosure <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:40:26 -0500
Well, it sure does help the anti-virus (anti-malware) and security
consulting business, but besides that... is it not safe to say that:
1) A hell of a lot of viruses/worms/trojans use IRC to wreck further havoc?
2) A considerable amount of "script kiddies" originate and grow through IRC?
3) A wee bit of software piracy occurs?
4) That many organized DoS attacks through PC zombies are initiated through IRC?
5) The anonymity of the whole thing helps to foster all the illegal
and malicious activity that occurs?
The list goes on and on...
Sorry to offend those that use IRC legitimately (LOL - find something
else to chat with your buddies), but why the hell are we not pushing
to sunset IRC?
What would IT be like today without IRC (or the like)? Am I narrow
minded to say that it would be a much safer place?
...D
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: devis: "Re: [in] Re: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as FireFox"
- Next in thread: Jeff Donahue: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Jeff Donahue: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: huhu: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Mister Coffee: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: shrek: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: james edwards: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Maybe reply: Bowes, Ronald (EST): "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Jason: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Maybe reply: Tim: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Michael Rutledge: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: dk: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Maybe reply: Danny: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Robert Wesley McGrew: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Gregory Gilliss: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Eric Paynter: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Micheal Espinola Jr: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Tim: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Darren Wolfe: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: J.A. Terranson: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Maybe reply: Bowes, Ronald (EST): "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Andrew Smith: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Christian Fromme: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Chris Umphress: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Barrie Dempster: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Maybe reply: Keith Pachulski: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Maybe reply: Keith Pachulski: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Maybe reply: Keith Pachulski: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: bkfsec: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Maybe reply: Richard Stevens: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Matthew Kent: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: TheGesus: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Janusz A. Urbanowicz: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: Nick FitzGerald: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: hutuworm: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Reply: nicolas vigier: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|