Re: [Full-Disclosure] 8->OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

From: Jason (security_at_brvenik.com)
Date: 11/16/04

  • Next message: Randal, Phil: "RE: [in] Re: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as FireFox" 
    To: "Clairmont, Jan M" <jan.m.clairmont@citigroup.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 22:36:12 -0500

    I brought this up before the elections and very few seemed interested in
    the topic. There were the normal grumblings of get this off list...

    If you want to know more about electronic voting see
    http://www.verifiedvoting.org and http://http://www.blackboxvoting.org/

    Clairmont, Jan M wrote:

    >I think we should keep this discussion going as long as
    >we are able, just to frustrate the thought police Nazi's
    >on this group. It is really ironic that a legitimate discussion
    >of electronic voting and Diebold and other voting systems, that
    >are not secure, is considered off-limits by some so-called
    >authorities.
    >
    >So please continue the discussion and I am interested as well
    >as many others who would like to know more about irregularities
    >and vulnerabilities of voting machines. Some use windows as their
    >servers and windows OS's so they are liable to hacking like any
    >on-line system. Does anyone know anything about the OS versions
    >Diebold was using and what testing was done to ensure the integrity
    >of the count?
    >
    >Warm Regards to the Thought Police?->
    >Jan Clairmont
    >Firewall Administrator/Consultant
    >
    >_______________________________________________
    >Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    >Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
    >
    >
    >

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

  • Next message: Randal, Phil: "RE: [in] Re: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as FireFox"

    Relevant Pages

    • [Full-Disclosure] 8->OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.
      ... of electronic voting and Diebold and other voting systems, ... Some use windows as their ... Diebold was using and what testing was done to ensure the integrity ...
      (Full-Disclosure)
    • Re: Perl Programmers, America Needs Your Help! We Need Secure Voting Machines
      ... > definitely have an almost immediate Perl solution. ... > Anyone researching the facts concerning electronic voting will ... > a fraction of the outrageous fees charged by Diebold, ... > entirely open source and uses Python. ...
      (comp.lang.perl.misc)
    • Electronic voting, we can all relax now.
      ... The coutnries largest electronic voting machine maker, Dibold, ... uses Windows CE in their products. ...
      (misc.survivalism)
    • Re: Kerrys wife - a lush
      ... impartial and un-tamperable machine to get the ... Nearly all electronic voting systems are built on top of Microsoft ... systems to be "open source": that is, the complete source code to the ...
      (alt.sports.baseball.bos-redsox)
    • Re: Urgent VB question related to protecting elections - time sensitive
      ... The best "electronic voting" in the country is what we use right here. ... If the voter community doesn't *trust* ... This is Diebold, for crying out loud, who would never dream of making an ATM ... that didn't leave a dual paper trail, because none of their customers would ...
      (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
    Loading