Re: [SPAM] [Full-Disclosure] Your daily internet traffic report
From: Dave Horsfall (dave_at_horsfall.org)
Date: 10/17/04
- Previous message: Frank de Wit: "Re: [SPAM] [Full-Disclosure] Your daily internet traffic report"
- In reply to: Hugo van der Kooij: "Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] [Full-Disclosure] Your daily internet traffic report"
- Next in thread: Michal Zalewski: "Re: [SPAM] [Full-Disclosure] Your daily internet traffic report"
- Reply: Michal Zalewski: "Re: [SPAM] [Full-Disclosure] Your daily internet traffic report"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 20:53:48 +1000 (EST)
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 lee.e.rian@census.gov wrote:
>
> > Lots 'o flame but no light.
> >
> > How about sharing your knowledge of why certain icmp traffic should be
> > allowed and the risks associated with allowing that traffic?
>
> Just to name one: Path MTU discovery (RFC 1191)
To those who seek to block ICMP, I say: "Let them." I'm sure that a
certain Mr. Charles Darwin will soon sort them out.
-- Dave
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Frank de Wit: "Re: [SPAM] [Full-Disclosure] Your daily internet traffic report"
- In reply to: Hugo van der Kooij: "Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] [Full-Disclosure] Your daily internet traffic report"
- Next in thread: Michal Zalewski: "Re: [SPAM] [Full-Disclosure] Your daily internet traffic report"
- Reply: Michal Zalewski: "Re: [SPAM] [Full-Disclosure] Your daily internet traffic report"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|