Re: [Full-Disclosure] Norton AntiVirus 2005 treats Radmin as a Virus ??!
From: Nick FitzGerald (nick_at_virus-l.demon.co.uk)
Date: 10/15/04
- Previous message: KF_lists: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] FDA Approves Use of Chip in Patients ? HIPAA woes?"
- In reply to: Noam Rathaus: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Norton AntiVirus 2005 treats Radmin as a Virus ??!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:08:23 +1300
Noam Rathaus wrote:
<<snip>>
> Clam doesn't think its a virus/Trojan/whatever
Which is significant why?
Clam has the highest false negative rate of all scanners apart from a
couple of obviously "toy" projects, so its non-detection of something
can hardly be seen as evidence of something's non-virus/Trojan/whatever
status...
> Noam Rathaus
> CTO
> Beyond Security Ltd.
I take it that is "beyond" as in "outside"...
Regards,
Nick FitzGerald
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: KF_lists: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] FDA Approves Use of Chip in Patients ? HIPAA woes?"
- In reply to: Noam Rathaus: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Norton AntiVirus 2005 treats Radmin as a Virus ??!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]