Re: [Full-Disclosure] Stealing DHCP Leases
From: Garth Stone (garth.stone_at_gmail.com)
Date: 10/13/04
- Previous message: Gregh: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] WIN XPSP2 - is this a possible way to hack?"
- In reply to: Ian Holm: "[Full-Disclosure] Stealing DHCP Leases"
- Next in thread: Hugo van der Kooij: "Re: [SPAM] [Full-Disclosure] Stealing DHCP Leases"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Ian Holm <macaddict@ourholm.com> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:51:15 +1000
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:08:07 -0700, Ian Holm <macaddict@ourholm.com> wrote:
> I was noticing that the number of DHCP address in the DHCP cache was running
> low so I decided to check which computers were assigned to each address. To
> my horror I saw that there were 81 addresses assigned at exactly the same
> time and all expired at exactly the same time. I'm assuming that these were
> all assigned to the same machine. How is this possible? Where could I learn
> about this and how to prevent it?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
Ive actually seen the same thing happen with a faulty network card..
We replaced it with an identical card and the problem was resolved..
Stick the faulty one back in.. Same problem.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Gregh: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] WIN XPSP2 - is this a possible way to hack?"
- In reply to: Ian Holm: "[Full-Disclosure] Stealing DHCP Leases"
- Next in thread: Hugo van der Kooij: "Re: [SPAM] [Full-Disclosure] Stealing DHCP Leases"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
