Re: [Full-Disclosure] [VirusTotal] Scan result (fwd)
From: Michel Messerschmidt (lists_at_michel-messerschmidt.de)
To: firstname.lastname@example.org Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 11:31:27 +0200
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 04:01:16PM -0400, Über GuidoZ wrote:
> It's kind of interesting to see the results, as it shows you what AV
> programs seem to detect things better then others.
I think this is actually misleading.
You know nearly nothing from scanning just a single (or 10, 50,...)
sample. And there are other basic test requirements. For example:
- the different results could be due to differences in the update
schedule at virustotal.com (some vendors offer their fastest updates
only for premium licenses, which virustotal may not have).
- maybe some products are used with optimized settings (for example
maximum heuristic detection) and others with default settings.
> It's also useful
> for known viruses, but needing to know what each AV program calls
> them. (I find this useful when trying to do tech support.)
You know Vgrep (http://www.virusbtn.com/resources/vgrep/index.xml) ?
-- Michel Messerschmidt email@example.com antiVirusTestCenter, Computer Science, University of Hamburg _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html