RE: !SPAM! [Full-Disclosure] Automated ssh scanning
From: Richard Verwayen (holle_at_ackw.de)
Date: 08/26/04
- Previous message: Serkan Akpolat: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: Hafiye-1.0 Terminal Escape Sequence Injection Vulnerability"
- In reply to: Todd Towles: "RE: !SPAM! [Full-Disclosure] Automated ssh scanning"
- Next in thread: Ron DuFresne: "RE: !SPAM! [Full-Disclosure] Automated ssh scanning"
- Reply: Ron DuFresne: "RE: !SPAM! [Full-Disclosure] Automated ssh scanning"
- Reply: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: !SPAM! [Full-Disclosure] Automated ssh scanning"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: FD <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:41:18 +0200
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 15:12, Todd Towles wrote:
> The kernel could be save. But with weak passwords, you are toast. Any
> automated tool would test guest/guest.
>
Hello Todd!
You are right about the passwords, but guest is only a unprivileged
account as you may have on many prodruction machines. But they managed
to become root on this machine due to a kernel(?) exploit!
Should I then consider any woody system to be insecure to let people
work at?
Richard
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Serkan Akpolat: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: Hafiye-1.0 Terminal Escape Sequence Injection Vulnerability"
- In reply to: Todd Towles: "RE: !SPAM! [Full-Disclosure] Automated ssh scanning"
- Next in thread: Ron DuFresne: "RE: !SPAM! [Full-Disclosure] Automated ssh scanning"
- Reply: Ron DuFresne: "RE: !SPAM! [Full-Disclosure] Automated ssh scanning"
- Reply: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: !SPAM! [Full-Disclosure] Automated ssh scanning"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading