Re: [Full-Disclosure] Unsecure file permission of ZoneAlarm pro. (ZA will fail to load)

From: Barrie Dempster (barrie_at_reboot-robot.net)
Date: 08/23/04

  • Next message: Clairmont, Jan M: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re-write with security in mind all ops."
    To: bipin gautam <visitbipin@yahoo.com>
    Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:23:07 +0100
    
    
    

    In reply to my own previous email, I assumed ZA would fail, as others
    have on this list, with an EVERYONE:DENY security policy, however this
    isn't the case.
    ZA 5.1 PRO Trial version will change this to EVERYONE:FULL for the
    duration of the program after which it will then change these settings
    back to the original EVERYONE:DENY. This throws out the DoS theory, but
    the permissions are still extremely permissive, if the "truevector
    driver" was to have issues with it's integrity checks then the files in
    this folder would be easily compromised.

    Since ZA can obviously access the file when they are set to
    EVERYONE:DENY it makes sense to leave them like that, which would be an
    added layer of security, you shouldn't override a security mechanism
    with your own if they can work together, especially if the existing
    mechanism doesn't conflict with yours, which in this case it obviously
    doesn't.

    Although as configuration files are in that folder, there is also an
    information disclosure issue to be addressed.

    I'm sure your clients would feel more secure in their choice of firewall
    product if it followed good security practise and maintained a level of
    least privilege, considering security as an in depth process.

    Consider /etc/passwd on unix, pre-shadow, this file was viewable by all
    and contained password hashes, but if you followed good security
    practise, changed the passwords regularly and made them difficult to
    break then this wasn't that much of an issue, however there was the
    chance that someone could crack a password before it's end of life,
    therefore it was felt prudent to hide these from the user as the user
    didn't _need_ to know (least privilege). This issue is very akin to that
    example. As a security vendor these are not new concepts to ZoneLabs,
    therefore they should be addressed

    Again apologies for my initial incorrect assumption, but the issue still
    stands, its unnecessarily open and requires a rethink.

    On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 12:28, Barrie Dempster wrote:
    > As for the ZA bug in particular, changing these permissions breaks ZA,
    > the admin could fix it and bring it back, but it would still be a DoS
    > and an effective ZA countermeasure for a virus. ZA, please fix this, the
    > people on this list complaining about it are correct, it does pose a
    > potential problem.
    >

    -- 
    Barrie Dempster (zeedo) - Fortiter et Strenue
      http://www.bsrf.org.uk
    [ gpg --recv-keys --keyserver www.keyserver.net 0x96025FD0 ]
    
    

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html



  • Next message: Clairmont, Jan M: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re-write with security in mind all ops."

    Relevant Pages

    • RE: What server hardening are you doing these days?
      ... permissions on their data, and Microsoft encourages ISVs to minimize ... I've been able to discuss ACLs and other security issues in Windows with ... Control or DAC (which is what you're referring to by the "stupid ...
      (Focus-Microsoft)
    • Re: Windows Firewall Wont Stay On
      ... I have come up with a solution that does not disable Security Center, ... By changing the Permissions of that key, ... settings from being changed again. ... the firewall alert settings in Security Center get ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
    • Re: get rid of security center?
      ... I have come up with a solution that does not disable Security Center, ... By changing the Permissions of that key, ... settings from being changed again. ... the firewall alert settings in Security Center get ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
    • Re: Password Protect IExplore
      ... You can protect the files and folders you store on your computer to make ... To set, view, change, or remove special permissions for files and folders ... clear the Inherit from parent the permission entries that apply ... To configure security so that the subfolders and files will not ...
      (microsoft.public.internet.explorer.ieak)
    • Re: Removing the Internet Security in SP2
      ... I have come up with a solution that does not disable Security Center, ... By changing the Permissions of that key, ... settings from being changed again. ... the firewall alert settings in Security Center get ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)