Re: [Full-Disclosure] WIndows XP SP2 "breaks" things

From: Niek Baakman (niekbaakman_at_home.nl)
Date: 08/11/04

  • Next message: John Hall: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] National Database of Variants with Fixes-non-vendor specific"
    To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
    Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:24:22 +0200
    
    

    Gregory A. Gilliss said the following on 8/11/2004 12:21 AM GMT+2:
    > All,
    >
    > Just FYI, my company is experiencing a high volume of calls from customers
    > claiming that they have installed Windows SP2. Customers claim that SP2 is
    > "breaking" previously working network behavior. Initial testing indicates
    > that the cause is the "Internet Firewall" settings on SP2 which have been
    > set to default closed! SO by FINALLY doing what ought to have been done
    > ages ago (as often argued in posts to this and other lists), Microsoft has
    > inadvertently "broken" several customer network installations that got used
    > to having transparency to network protocols that, after the installation of
    > SP2, are no longer permitted.
    >
    > Yay Microsoft, you finally got it right (sort of).
    >
    > G

    I do not see how this is different than people opening virus attachments.
    "Oh look here is something which looks familiar, lets click it."
    And then blaming someone else for the trouble they find themselves in.

    Seriously, you've had more than enough time to educate yourself on the
    subject of SP2 for Windows XP. Microsoft released numerous docs on the
    subject. All the industry's websites/magazines are covering it almost every
    day, and still you blame Microsoft for 'breaking' your customers network
    installations ?

    Perhaps now would be a good time to educate yourself ?

    Kind regards,

    Niek Baakman

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


  • Next message: John Hall: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] National Database of Variants with Fixes-non-vendor specific"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: needs automated clean-up tool [Re: Office 2007 beta uninstall]
      ... for both us and the customers. ... to get rid of every trace of Office 2007 beta, but that wastes a great deal ... We really have to wonder if any of those representing the Microsoft line on ... Why is it so hard to understand that we expect the Microsoft installation ...
      (microsoft.public.office.setup)
    • Re: How much is to much? Why should my clients have to pay again?
      ... > clients have had a problem with this new fangled validation tool. ... Microsoft, hear me: MOST PEOPLE DO NOT READ THE NEWS ABOUT PC ... > I assume you mean you have had customers complaining they could not ... > I don't know how you billed each one $200 (what did you do to fix the ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsupdate)
    • A vote for bringing back classic menus as an option
      ... the power of a PC and result in a nice ROI for my small business customers. ... but I feel strongly that the Ribbons are NOT easier to ... If Microsoft cares, my findings amongst family, friends, and customers is ... Ribbons are easier/slicker/wonderful for some folks, but for us folks here in ...
      (microsoft.public.office.misc)
    • Re: lets vote for better security
      ... How many times have you been said linux ... this is a ploy to lie to customers. ... > A frequent Microsoft explanation for why they did something a certain way ... It was found that all browsers except IE ...
      (microsoft.public.security)
    • Re: Internal GameStop memo all but confirms 360 price drop coming August 8th 2007.
      ... "That's a Sony parlor trick and Microsoft doesn't bullshit their ... I didn't say Microsoft was a good guy.... ... bullshit their customers. ...
      (alt.games.video.xbox)