RE: [Full-Disclosure] Security hole in Confixx backup script
From: Aditya, ALD [Aditya Lalit Deshmukh] (aditya.deshmukh_at_online.gateway.technolabs.net)
Date: 08/11/04
- Previous message: Gary E. Miller: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] National Database of Variants with Fixes-non-vendor specific"
- In reply to: Dirk Pirschel: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Security hole in Confixx backup script"
- Next in thread: Sergey Lystsev: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Security hole in Confixx backup script"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Dirk Pirschel" <dirk@pirschel.de>, <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 09:45:47 +0530
> > (which is why 'suidperl' exists).
> > Other than that, you're on the right track.. ;)
>
> What about a suid bash? ;-)
i believe that the shell script will run but if the user is not root then the shell script will not have root privs but normal privs of the user, this has been like this bash 2.03 or earlier...
-aditya
________________________________________________________________________
Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Gary E. Miller: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] National Database of Variants with Fixes-non-vendor specific"
- In reply to: Dirk Pirschel: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Security hole in Confixx backup script"
- Next in thread: Sergey Lystsev: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Security hole in Confixx backup script"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]