Re: [Full-Disclosure] Security hole in Confixx backup script
Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu
Date: 08/10/04
- Previous message: Todd Towles: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] AV Naming Convention"
- In reply to: Dirk Pirschel: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Security hole in Confixx backup script"
- Next in thread: Thomas Loch: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Security hole in Confixx backup script"
- Reply: Thomas Loch: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Security hole in Confixx backup script"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Dirk Pirschel <dirk@pirschel.de> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:42:53 -0400
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 12:42:35 +0200, Dirk Pirschel said:
> What about a suid bash? ;-)
That counts as working a little harder. ;)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Todd Towles: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] AV Naming Convention"
- In reply to: Dirk Pirschel: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Security hole in Confixx backup script"
- Next in thread: Thomas Loch: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Security hole in Confixx backup script"
- Reply: Thomas Loch: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Security hole in Confixx backup script"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
