Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cool Web Search
From: JacK (jack_at_websecurite.org)
Date: 07/30/04
- Previous message: KUIJPERS Jimmy: "RE: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cool Web Search"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:16:13 +0200
Message: 30
From: "Gregh" <chows@ozemail.com.au>
> Sorry but totally and utterly incorrect. You just do NOT understand what I
> have typed. I said that I used HiJackThis to list the entries in a group
> then ticked them manually and then removed them. Along with that, it
> allowed
> you to identify the exe files that went with it.
Rather you don't understand what we are speaking about : we discuss new
tricky CWS variants
> If you dont understand that then I can understand that you dont know how
> to
> get rid of it but the truth is that this way DOES get rid of it. There are
> at LEAST 5 variants of CWS. I have met them all and beat them all.
Oh ? I know at least 30 :-D
The old ones are very kind and you can easily get rid of it the way you give
but for the new ons, you may forget it :o)
If you don't understand that there are new variants, it's useless trying to
explain how to get rid of the classic variants : anybody know how to handle
them. It DOES NOT WORK for the newer variants. Is that beyond your
understanding ?
Regards,
-- JacK _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: KUIJPERS Jimmy: "RE: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cool Web Search"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|