Re: [Full-Disclosure] Vulnerability in sourceforge.net
From: nicolas vigier (boklm_at_mars-attacks.org)
Date: 07/23/04
- Previous message: Rob Rosenberger: "mi2g attacks "so-called" security sites"
- In reply to: Gregory A. Gilliss: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Vulnerability in sourceforge.net"
- Next in thread: nicolas vigier: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Vulnerability in sourceforge.net"
- Reply: nicolas vigier: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Vulnerability in sourceforge.net"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Gregory A. Gilliss" <ggilliss@netpublishing.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 02:33:04 +0200
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Gregory A. Gilliss wrote:
> Really...FreeBSD comes with user nobody set to /sbin/nologin out of the
> box. Maybe they should have chosen a better host OS?
I think they should first think about updating the kernel (I submited a
Support request yesterday but they don't really seem to care a lot about
the security of this web server).
Linux sc8-pr-web6 2.4.20-24.9bigmem #1 SMP Mon Dec 1 11:14:38 EST 2003 i686
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Rob Rosenberger: "mi2g attacks "so-called" security sites"
- In reply to: Gregory A. Gilliss: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Vulnerability in sourceforge.net"
- Next in thread: nicolas vigier: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Vulnerability in sourceforge.net"
- Reply: nicolas vigier: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Vulnerability in sourceforge.net"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|