RE: [Full-Disclosure] OFF TOPIC: antisemitic troll

From: Ron DuFresne (dufresne_at_winternet.com)
Date: 07/22/04

  • Next message: Evgeny Demidov: "[Full-Disclosure] Samba 3.x swat preauthentication buffer overflow" 
    To: Brad Griffin <b.griffin@cqu.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 09:22:12 -0500 (CDT)

            [SNIP]

    >
    > Your comment that 'One man's opinion is hardly proof' seems a tad inane
    > doesn't it? After all, the content of the site is *not* 'one man's
    > opinion'. It is a collection of articles from mainstream media agencies,
    > not one man's opinion. If you read the text you quoted, it says 'one
    > man's effort', it says absolutely nothing about 'opinion'.
    >

    The choice of articles used on the site might actually be the basis of the
    "One man's opinion" quote made in the prior post. If the selected
    articles are not equally balanced then indeed there is a single oppinion
    being displayed. But, certainly this is not an argument for this list.

    I, like many others here have oppionins in this area, but, they do not
    belong on this list. So, if others wish to discuss these matters, let's
    take it off list here, either to private e-mail or form a list
    specifically for this kind of discussion and let those seeking security
    information on OS/application/networking get back to their searches.

    Thanks,

    Ron DuFresne
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It
    eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
    business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
            ***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***

    OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything.

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

  • Next message: Evgeny Demidov: "[Full-Disclosure] Samba 3.x swat preauthentication buffer overflow"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: a little something for all you wikipedia-lovers
      ... "common opinion". ... But this is NO MORE the case, since not the articles, but the ... meatball theory was proposed as an alternative to general relativity so ... got editors, but that its editors' competence can't be guaranteed. ...
      (sci.lang)
    • Re: Why no uproar about Washington state putting down Nascar and its fans?
      ... and get ideas for future articles. ... the publishers, haha, you mean they don't care about first nd up close ... fans have to say. ... I'm not here to promote my opinion. ...
      (rec.autos.sport.nascar)
    • Re: It turns out the Iranian president is nuts
      ... >> kuff (Isaac Adams) wrote: ... YOU CITED ONLY RENSE. ... > You have your opinion from "reading some full articles". ...
      (alt.religion.islam)
    • RE: [Full-Disclosure] OFF TOPIC: antisemitic troll
      ... Uh oh fatal code snowcrash snip snip snip... ... > Your comment that 'One man's opinion is hardly proof' seems a tad inane ... The choice of articles used on the site might actually be the basis of the ... please notify the sender thereof and destroy / delete the message. ...
      (Full-Disclosure)
    • Re: Invisible Objects...
      ... his opinion counts for more than most yahoos. ... with today are retroactively inserted into the core rulebooks is... ... I'm sure that you know the article we're discussing is called "Rules Of The Game" and has descriptive text which shows that WOTC intends it as a series of articles to RESOLVE RULES QUESTIONS: ... If you've got specific reasons on WHY positioning but not peception affects flanking, please explain the xorn's special ability. ...
      (rec.games.frp.dnd)