Re: [Full-Disclosure] New MyDoom or Netsky variant?

From: Timothy Chase (timothychase_at_gmail.com)
Date: 07/20/04

  • Next message: Timothy Chase: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] New MyDoom or Netsky variant?"
    To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
    Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 19:54:56 -0700
    
    

    Sorry -- I see Mary was replying to Vic. I got distracted right in
    the middle of writing the email. Two dabbers.

    67.68.216.161
    200.119.233.137

    On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 19:26:39 -0700, Timothy Chase
    <timothychase@gmail.com> wrote:
    > Mary,
    >
    > You have a good eye!
    >
    > According to Sophos, there is a new W32/MyDoom-N, and they have
    > updated their signature files accordingly. You can expect that all
    > the major antivirus companies will quickly follow suite if they
    > haven't already.
    >
    > I just had a Dabber on ports 5554 and 8967... Old stuff, but the bug
    > is helping me debug.
    >
    >
    >
    > On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:42:04 -0700 (PDT), mnv@alumni.princeton.edu
    > <mnv@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote:
    > > FWIW:
    > > Using NAV Pro 10.0.1.13, Virus Def's updated today, to
    > > 7/17/2004 defs. Received 3 emails, 44kb attachment,
    > > none detected as a virus.
    > >
    > > BODY OF EMAIL:
    > > The original message was received at Tue, 20 Jul 2004
    > > 11:21:16 +1200
    > > from alumni.princeton.edu [(IP here varies each email)
    > >
    > > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal
    > > errors -----
    > > <mnv@alumni.princeton.edu>
    > >
    > > ----- Transcript of session follows -----
    > > while talking to alumni.princeton.edu.:
    > > >>> MAIL From:"Automatic Email Delivery Software"
    > > <postmaster@alumni.princeton.edu>
    > > <<< 501 "Automatic Email Delivery Software"
    > > <postmaster@alumni.princeton.edu>...
    > > Refused
    > >
    > > ATTACHMENTS:
    > > message.zip
    > > letter.com
    > > pni.zip
    > >
    > > Subjects:
    > > Test
    > > <none>
    > > Returned mail: Data format error
    > >
    > > And a 4th, subject "Deliveryfailed" that just shows up
    > > as garbage text in the body, webmail indicates
    > > attachment present.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > _______________________________________________
    > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    > > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
    > >
    >

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


  • Next message: Timothy Chase: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] New MyDoom or Netsky variant?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: BoB - HLCGB
      ... It makes your writing difficult to understand and makes me think that the ... Kieron wasn't replying to my message, he was replying to Little Paul. ... a linking rings routine in front of myself and Robin Gunney, ...
      (rec.juggling)
    • Creating an Excel Spreadsheet
      ... Is Jakarta POI considered an accepted standard for creating and writing to ... Excel spreadsheets?http://jakarta.apache.org/poi/index.html ... remove clothes before replying ...
      (comp.lang.java.help)
    • Re: Fellow Enviro Needs Vandemans Help
      ... Looks like Mike is writing and replying to himself again..... ... one thing that Vandeman is right about: ...
      (alt.mountain-bike)
    • Re: How good an encryption algorithm is this?
      ... I'm not looking at writing it in C#, ... fairly algorithmic question in general I thought I'd post it here. ... that caused offence. ... > If replying to the group, please do not mail me too ...
      (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
    • Re: How good an encryption algorithm is this?
      ... I'm not looking at writing it in C#, ... fairly algorithmic question in general I thought I'd post it here. ... that caused offence. ... > If replying to the group, please do not mail me too ...
      (microsoft.public.vc.language)