Re: [Full-Disclosure] Is Mozilla's "patch" enough?

From: Georgi Guninski (guninski_at_guninski.com)
Date: 07/12/04

  • Next message: Barry Fitzgerald: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Is Mozilla's "patch" enough?" 
    To: Aviv Raff <avivra@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:42:07 +0300

    On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 05:23:29PM +0300, Aviv Raff wrote:
    >
    > I understand that if an attacker has the ability to change the user.js
    > file he can do worse things, but why should there be a way to override
    > security patches without uninstalling them?
    >

    if you understand your dumbness why do you continue to polute the list?
    updated builds for the so called "os" are available at mozilla.org - go get
    them.
    there are a lot of ways to override security patches without uninstalling them

    georgi
     

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

  • Next message: Barry Fitzgerald: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Is Mozilla's "patch" enough?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: 10.4.11 slow?
      ... It seems to have slowed my G4 PowerBook to a crawl - ... uninstalling it? ...
      (comp.sys.mac.system)
    • Re: [Full-Disclosure] Is Mozillas "patch" enough?
      ... Security patches shouldn't be overridden unless intended too. ... settings by simply applying the patch again, ... >> file he can do worse things, but why should there be a way to override ... > there are a lot of ways to override security patches without uninstalling them ...
      (Full-Disclosure)
    • Quantcast