Re: [Full-Disclosure] Gmail Information Disclosure Vulnerability

From: System Outage (system_outage_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 07/05/04

  • Next message: Fred Mobach: "Re: Public Review of OIS Security Vulnerability Reporting and ResponseGuidelines" 
    To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 09:00:20 -0700 (PDT)

    If it's about posting advisories, why do many decide to post the exploit along with the advisory. To me this is not a responsible thing to do. Whoever knows how many script kiddies are sleeping on this list and taking advantage of the free exploit giveaway's seen here.
     
    10 days isn't an awful long time and the vendor never made primary contact with the user in question. Meaning, for whatever reason the e-mail may not have been delivered and because of this the Gmail Team could easily of been caught short on this issue and a serious hole exposed to the public, before the vendor (Gmail) has had a chance to scramble together an incident response and get the hole patched out, before a serious number of account's become compromised on the service.
     
    There is a difference between responsible "Full Disclosure" and irresponsible "Full Disclosure".
     
     
    Cheerio
     
     

    Tremaine <tremaine@gmail.com> wrote:
    It's about posting security advisories. The initial poster advises
    they notified the gmail team, and posted this advisory 10 days later.

    It is immaterial whether an application is in alpha, beta or
    production. If the software or application is in use outside the
    development team, and there is a security issue, it is relevant to
    this list.

    It's called Full Disclosure for a reason... not partial disclosure,
    not disclosure of production applications only... Full Disclosure.

    If you want partial disclosure, you may need to rethink your
    subscription to the list. 

    -- 
Tremaine
IT Security Consultant
----- Original Message -----
From: System Outage 
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 06:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Gmail Information Disclosure Vulnerability
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
If it's not about respect then what is it about? 
You have no respect for the Gmail Team, that's for sure.
I guess this list isn't about respect...
It's about kiddies posting advisories and exploits for fun and little
care for the vendor(s).
Cheerio
amforward@mailsurf.com wrote:
System Outage wrote:
|The correct channel to post such "bugs" is the Gmail contact link for "bug 
|reports". 
I have already contacted Gmail about 10 days ago, but I have not received any 
replies till this moment.
|If you had waited until the Gmail dev team declared gmail a public release, 
|you would have gained more respect in the security community scene.
I don't think this is about respect afterall.
Regards,
Ahmed Motaz
------------------------------------------------------
Mailsurf.com your communication portal for SMS,
Email, Fax, E-Cards and more. www.mailsurf.com
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
  • Next message: Fred Mobach: "Re: Public Review of OIS Security Vulnerability Reporting and ResponseGuidelines"

    Relevant Pages