Re: [Full-Disclosure] Successful in blocking all known exploits
From: Eric Paynter (eric_at_arcticbears.com)
Date: 07/04/04
- Previous message: Andre Ludwig: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Successful in blocking all known exploits"
- In reply to: Maarten: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Successful in blocking all known exploits"
- Next in thread: stephane nasdrovisky: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Successful in blocking all known exploits"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 19:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
On Sat, July 3, 2004 1:55 pm, Maarten said:
> On Saturday 03 July 2004 18:25, J.A. Terranson wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, RandallM wrote:
>>> I have been up and running for 876 days straight and have had no
>>> problems to date!
>>
>> Yeah, but what about Windowz boxes?
>
> Hum, how did you guess he isn't talking about a windows box ? 8-))
I can't think of a single platform that hasn't had some kind of
security-related kernel patch in that period of time. Unless that box is
isolated from the Internet, it is ripe for hacking. The only thing
protecting it is luck.
-Eric
-- arctic bears - affordable email and name services @yourdomain.com http://www.arcticbears.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Andre Ludwig: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Successful in blocking all known exploits"
- In reply to: Maarten: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Successful in blocking all known exploits"
- Next in thread: stephane nasdrovisky: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Successful in blocking all known exploits"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]