Re: [Full-Disclosure] Presidential Candidates' Websites Vulnerable
From: Ron DuFresne (dufresne_at_winternet.com)
To: Jordan Klein <email@example.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:40:38 -0500 (CDT)
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Jordan Klein wrote:
> > Anybody have any better ideas? We certainly can't trust the politicians or
> Diebold. Considering the results of the last
> > election the whole process seems questionable, like in Chicago
> > "vote early, vote often."
> IMO, the only way to have the best of both worlds (electronic voting that
> helps the impaired, and an audit trail) is to have them print out some sort
> of encoded bar-code receipt that is what gets tallied. When you vote, you
> immediately get two receipts. One to take home that gives you the name(s)
> of who you voted for, and the other is read by a counting machine that
> actually tallies the votes. The electronic voting machine that you use
> should NOT actually tally any votes. The bar-coded receipt that is tallied
> should also be a one-use code. That way, someone could run them through as
That's just reverting back to a paper vote process, why waste the time and
effort and expense to put in a bunch of calculators that preint up more
paper fed into another calculator? Might as well go back to punchcards
and either a hand tally or feed the cards into another calculator...
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***
OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything.
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.