Re: [Full-Disclosure] Web sites compromised by IIS attack
From: Aditya, ALD [ Aditya Lalit Deshmukh ] (aditya.deshmukh_at_online.gateway.technolabs.net)
Date: 07/01/04
- Previous message: Aditya, ALD [ Aditya Lalit Deshmukh ]: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Tools for checking for presence of adware remotely"
- In reply to: Denis Dimick: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Web sites compromised by IIS attack"
- Next in thread: Denis Dimick: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Web sites compromised by IIS attack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Denis Dimick" <denis@dimick.net>, "Frank Knobbe" <frank@knobbe.us> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:08:55 +0530
> > Right. But we also need better methodologies for vendors to fix their
> > products. The emphasis here is on "the vendor fixing the broken
> > product". It should not be a burden on the consumer, but on the vendor.
> >
>
> Like I said, Do you REALLY want a vendor to install patches for you?
i would never trust any patch from red hat / sun system / microsoft without actually testing it on a sacrificial lamb before going in production use.
щb╜ъ▐vы"ЮaxZ▐xўл▓Й┌ФGb╢*'бєК[kjпЁ├цj)mнк rЙ
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Aditya, ALD [ Aditya Lalit Deshmukh ]: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Tools for checking for presence of adware remotely"
- In reply to: Denis Dimick: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Web sites compromised by IIS attack"
- Next in thread: Denis Dimick: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Web sites compromised by IIS attack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|