Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint
From: John Kinsella (jlk_at_thrashyour.com)
Date: 06/29/04
- Previous message: Edward W. Ray: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint; IMHO Netscreen is far superior"
- In reply to: Darkslaker: "[Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint"
- Next in thread: Laurent LEVIER: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:18:19 -0700
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 01:24:05PM -0500, Darkslaker wrote:
> i am studying for the CCSA and my Friend for CSPFA in the interchange of
> ideas we did not find differences significant; maybe two ; PIX run in OS
> for CISCO and CheckPoint in many platforms; and checkPoit have more
> products.
> My question is PIX or Checkpoint what is better and why.
I think one good point which hasn't been brought up yet is if you need
to manage security at one or many enforcement points - Checkpoint scales
much nicer for centralized management across multiple management points
(or multiple companies for MSPs) with FW-1 and P-1 than anything I've
seen from Cisco.
Personally I was scarred by some bugs in various 5.x versions of PIX
software.
(oh and to echo the point of another person, PLEASE, for the love of
(insert 1+ diety) do not run a firewall on a Windows OS)
John
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Edward W. Ray: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint; IMHO Netscreen is far superior"
- In reply to: Darkslaker: "[Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint"
- Next in thread: Laurent LEVIER: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|