RE: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint

From: James Patterson Wicks (pwicks_at_oxygen.com)
Date: 06/29/04

  • Next message: B3r3n: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint"
    To: Darkslaker <rienzi@nimrod.com.mx>, full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
    Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:59:22 -0400
    
    

    Three letters . . .

    PDM

    The Pix Device Manager is painful to work with. CheckPoint's interface is very intuitive and easy to use.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Darkslaker
    Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 2:24 PM
    To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
    Subject: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint

    i am studying for the CCSA and my Friend for CSPFA in the interchange of
    ideas we did not find differences significant; maybe two ; PIX run in OS
    for CISCO and CheckPoint in many platforms; and checkPoit have more
    products.

    My question is PIX or Checkpoint what is better and why.

    "Yo nací para atrapar dragones en sus guaridas y para recoger flores. Yo
    nací para pasar las mañanas contando historias divertidas, para soñar a la
    deriva como si fuera yo un arroyo y para caminar descalzo a la luz del sol"

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

    This e-mail is the property of Oxygen Media, LLC. It is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Distribution or copying of this e-mail or the information contained herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by sending an e-mail to postmaster@oxygen.com and destroy all electronic and paper copies of this e-mail.

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


  • Next message: B3r3n: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint"

    Relevant Pages

    • RE: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint
      ... a basic firewall and you have no bucks, go PIX. ... >My question is PIX or Checkpoint what is better and why. ... >"Yo nací para atrapar dragones en sus guaridas y para recoger flores. ...
      (Full-Disclosure)
    • VPN - Cisco PIX to Checkpoing FW-1 troubleshooting
      ... I was trying to establish VPN between a pix and a checkpoint. ... isakmp policy 10 authentication pre-share ...
      (comp.security.firewalls)
    • Re: Nokia and CheckPoint or Cisco?
      ... Currently use a Nokia IP330 box with CheckPoint on. ... Cisco PDM has a basic GUI for PIX. ... active/standby mode, except when PIX 7.x is configured using multiple ...
      (comp.security.firewalls)
    • [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint
      ... ideas we did not find differences significant; maybe two; PIX run in OS ... My question is PIX or Checkpoint what is better and why. ... nací para pasar las mañanas contando historias divertidas, ...
      (Full-Disclosure)
    • RE: Firewall recommendations?
      ... I have run both Checkpoint and PIX in my environment. ... The PIX is a true stateful inspection firewall. ... I am not a big fan of the pix and I have never played with the ISA ...
      (Security-Basics)