Re: [Full-Disclosure] M$ - so what should they do?
Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu
Date: 06/22/04
- Previous message: joe: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] M$ - so what should they do?"
- In reply to: Ron DuFresne: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] M$ - so what should they do?"
- Next in thread: Nick FitzGerald: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] M$ - so what should they do?"
- Reply: Nick FitzGerald: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] M$ - so what should they do?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Ron DuFresne <dufresne@winternet.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 19:00:57 -0400
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 16:06:43 CDT, Ron DuFresne said:
>
> [SNIP}
>
> >
> > The second one, I concur completely, get the App stuff out of the Windows
> > folders.
> >
>
> Which includes IE.
Actually, just doing that one *alone* (splitting it out so it isn't entwined into
the OS) would probably do more than anything else. But we're not likely to see
that happen, not since the Microsoft witnesses swore on a Bible that IE was an
integral part of the OS....
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: joe: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] M$ - so what should they do?"
- In reply to: Ron DuFresne: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] M$ - so what should they do?"
- Next in thread: Nick FitzGerald: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] M$ - so what should they do?"
- Reply: Nick FitzGerald: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] M$ - so what should they do?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|