Re: [Full-Disclosure] MS Anti Virus?
From: DAN MORRILL (dan_20407_at_msn.com)
Date: 06/17/04
- Previous message: joe: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] MS Anti Virus?"
- Maybe in reply to: Robert Michael Slade: "[Full-Disclosure] MS Anti Virus?"
- Next in thread: Joshua Levitsky: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] MS Anti Virus?"
- Reply: Joshua Levitsky: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] MS Anti Virus?"
- Reply: Gregory A. Gilliss: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] MS Anti Virus?"
- Reply: Eric Paynter: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] MS Anti Virus?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: ssch@wheel.dk, mvp@joeware.net Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:51:19 +0000
You make anti virus software sound like a gun lock on a 9MM.
Does it really matter who is in the anti-virus market? If Microsoft goes
that way, and they have the best knowledge of what they created, what we can
reasonably expect to see in the words of Bill Gates "Innovation, with rich
user features, deeply embeded in our software".
So, we can have an AV product that does great things, but maybe only 2% of
it will be used, and because it is a microsoft product, we can expect
patches every month, with known and unknown vulnerabilites from day one.
LOL!
r/
Dan
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: joe: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] MS Anti Virus?"
- Maybe in reply to: Robert Michael Slade: "[Full-Disclosure] MS Anti Virus?"
- Next in thread: Joshua Levitsky: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] MS Anti Virus?"
- Reply: Joshua Levitsky: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] MS Anti Virus?"
- Reply: Gregory A. Gilliss: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] MS Anti Virus?"
- Reply: Eric Paynter: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] MS Anti Virus?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|