RE: [Full-Disclosure] Akamai
From: Chris Carlson (chris_at_compucounts.com)
To: "james edwards" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 17:47:07 -0400
Need to register, but it's no hassle.
I'd mirror to my server, but copyright blah blah blah.
Anyone have any more info?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com
> [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of
> james edwards
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 16:45
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Akamai
> > I've just been told that it was a DoS. No details.
> Unlikely, Akamai is an overlay network & the root content
> node is not reachable.
> Akamai can in real time spread web traffic through out their
> global network of servers, diluting a DoS to the point it is
> not significant. It is more likely that the complexity of the
> overlay network was the cause. Last week it was a DNS issue
> and it seemed much the same this week. Provided you know the
> IP's of the content servers you would find they were still
> up. At least that was what I as seeing.
> Here is some info on Overlay Networks:
> Dr. Andersons "Mayday: Distributed Filtering for Internet Services "
> is quite interesting.
> James H. Edwards
> Routing and Security Administrator
> At the Santa Fe Office: Internet at Cyber Mesa
> firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com
> (505) 795-7101
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.