Re: [Full-Disclosure] Possible First Crypto Virus Definitely Discovered!
From: James Bliss (james.bliss_at_comcast.net)
Date: 06/08/04
- Previous message: Nils Ketelsen: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Possible First Crypto Virus Definitely Discovered!"
- In reply to: Billy B. Bilano: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Possible First Crypto Virus Definitely Discovered!"
- Next in thread: VB: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Possible First Crypto Virus Definitely Discovered!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 12:46:12 -0500
> Whatever ssl is, I don't know but it's using the so-called "ssl" port on
> the web servers. I don't think it has anything to do with whatever ssl
> was back in the old days of UNIX. It has a lower port number and that
> means it's an older port! Probably from the 1970s!
>
> Besides, why should I see any encrypted traffic on any port other than
> SSH? I don't expect to see encryption on anything other than the SSH
> port 22 (which is a very old port).
You are kidding, right? SSL = Secured Sockets Layer. It probably includes
encryption. It would not be too _SECURE_ if it was plain text.
SSH = Secured Shell
Notice the use of _SECURED_ in both their names?
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Nils Ketelsen: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Possible First Crypto Virus Definitely Discovered!"
- In reply to: Billy B. Bilano: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Possible First Crypto Virus Definitely Discovered!"
- Next in thread: VB: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Possible First Crypto Virus Definitely Discovered!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|