Re: [Full-Disclosure] Breaking Laws Cisco's stolen code
Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu
Date: 05/28/04
- Previous message: Dave Aitel: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Printer Buffer Security??"
- In reply to: Bart.Lansing_at_kohls.com: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Breaking Laws Cisco's stolen code"
- Next in thread: madsaxon: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Breaking Laws Cisco's stolen code"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Bart.Lansing@kohls.com Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 17:23:13 -0400
On Fri, 28 May 2004 15:42:37 CDT, Bart.Lansing@kohls.com said:
> lol, ok, I think we can both take off the tinfoil hats now, eh?
ObSecurity: The Internet-Draft includes this sentence:
"Mechanisms should be in place to limit unauthorized personnel
from performing or knowing about lawfully authorized intercepts. "
Read the rest of the draft, and ponder how "HI1" and "MD" in Figure
1 can be attacked for fun and profit by a black hat. Then contemplate
what's already been done to the existing CALEA:
http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20030710.html
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Dave Aitel: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Printer Buffer Security??"
- In reply to: Bart.Lansing_at_kohls.com: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Breaking Laws Cisco's stolen code"
- Next in thread: madsaxon: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Breaking Laws Cisco's stolen code"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
