[Full-Disclosure] RE: Full-Disclosure digest, Vol 1 #1675 - 32 msgs
From: RandallM (randallm_at_fidmail.com)
Date: 05/28/04
- Previous message: Nick FitzGerald: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Imaging Operating Systems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com> Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 05:52:45 -0500
Yo! Skylined, don't hold back, tell us how you really feel!
<|>Message: 30
<|>From: "Berend-Jan Wever" <SkyLined@edup.tudelft.nl>
<|>To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>
<|>Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] lists, autoresponders, and netiquette
<|>Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 03:42:40 +0200
<|>
<|>>Every time I post to a list I get these "out of office" auto-responses.
<|>>Can these responders be configured to not respond to stuff from a list?
<|>>
<|>>-Michael
<|>
<|>Yes, they can... and no, they won't. Too much ***-for-brains dumb-ass
<|>good-for-nothing mofo's on the list for that. Why the hell do you think
<|>every none informative troll thread is repied to at least 30 times?
<|>That's
<|>just because there are more people subscribed that get a hard on from
<|>annoying people (or are just plain stupid) then there are that get a hard
<|>on
<|>from actually contributing something.
<|>
<|>As a matter of fact I'm just replying because my girlfriend broke up with
<|>me
<|>and I'm drunk, else I wouldn't even bother: I just felt like being a
<|>***-for-brains dumb-ass good-for-nothing mofo.
<|>
<|>Cheer,
<|>SkyLined
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Nick FitzGerald: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Imaging Operating Systems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]